2009 Holden Epica vs. 2010 Holden Epica
To start off, 2010 Holden Epica is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Holden Epica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Holden Epica would be higher. Both 2009 Holden Epica and 2010 Holden Epica are equipped with a 1,991 cc engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 148 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 320 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Holden Epica | 2010 Holden Epica | |
Make | Holden | Holden |
Model | Epica | Epica |
Year Released | 2009 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 320 Nm | 320 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4805 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.5 L/100km | 7.5 L/100km |