2009 Holden Epica vs. 2010 Nissan Navara
To start off, 2010 Nissan Navara is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Holden Epica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Holden Epica would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Nissan Navara is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2010 Nissan Navara is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Holden Epica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Navara will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Nissan Navara has automatic transmission and 2009 Holden Epica has manual transmission. 2009 Holden Epica will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Nissan Navara will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Holden Epica | 2010 Nissan Navara | |
| Make | Holden | Nissan |
| Model | Epica | Navara |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 2993 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4805 mm | 5140 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 3210 mm |
