2009 Honda Accord vs. 1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk
To start off, 2009 Honda Accord is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk would be higher. At 3,469 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Honda Accord is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk weights approximately 171 kg more than 2009 Honda Accord.
Because 1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Honda Accord, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Honda Accord | 1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk | |
| Make | Honda | Studebaker |
| Model | Accord | Sky Hawk |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1962 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3469 cc | 2779 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 271 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1129 kg | 1300 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 5150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2980 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 68 L |
