2009 Honda Accord vs. 2004 Mercury Sable
To start off, 2009 Honda Accord is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mercury Sable. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mercury Sable would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mercury Sable is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Honda Accord (190 HP) has 35 more horse power than 2004 Mercury Sable. (155 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Honda Accord should accelerate faster than 2004 Mercury Sable. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mercury Sable weights approximately 384 kg more than 2009 Honda Accord.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mercury Sable (251 Nm) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Honda Accord. (220 Nm). This means 2004 Mercury Sable will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Honda Accord.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Honda Accord | 2004 Mercury Sable | |
Make | Honda | Mercury |
Model | Accord | Sable |
Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2352 cc | 2983 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 155 HP |
Torque | 220 Nm | 251 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 16.3:1 | 9.7:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1129 kg | 1513 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 5080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 7.6 L/100km | 9.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 10.7 L/100km | 12.5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.4 L/100km | 10.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 68 L |