2009 Honda Civic vs. 1966 Mercury Cougar

To start off, 2009 Honda Civic is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 4,728 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Honda Civic (140 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1966 Mercury Cougar. (129 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Honda Civic should accelerate faster than 1966 Mercury Cougar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Honda Civic weights approximately 99 kg more than 1966 Mercury Cougar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1966 Mercury Cougar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Mercury Cougar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Honda Civic, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Honda Civic 1966 Mercury Cougar
Make Honda Mercury
Model Civic Cougar
Year Released 2009 1966
Body Type Coupe Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1797 cc 4728 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 140 HP 129 HP
Engine RPM 6300 RPM 4400 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1461 kg 1362 kg
Vehicle Length 4460 mm 4990 mm
Vehicle Width 1760 mm 1890 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1320 mm
Wheelbase Size 2660 mm 2830 mm