2009 Honda CR-V vs. 1961 Volvo 220
To start off, 2009 Honda CR-V is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Volvo 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Volvo 220 would be higher. At 2,354 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Honda CR-V (166 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 1961 Volvo 220. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 1961 Volvo 220. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Honda CR-V weights approximately 437 kg more than 1961 Volvo 220. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Honda CR-V (218 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 74 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Volvo 220. (144 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2009 Honda CR-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Volvo 220.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Honda CR-V | 1961 Volvo 220 | |
Make | Honda | Volvo |
Model | CR-V | 220 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1961 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2354 cc | 1778 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 166 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 218 Nm | 144 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 2300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1452 kg | 1015 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2610 mm |