2009 Honda CR-V vs. 1963 Lincoln Continental
To start off, 2009 Honda CR-V is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 7,048 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Lincoln Continental (284 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 136 more horse power than 2009 Honda CR-V. (148 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Lincoln Continental should accelerate faster than 2009 Honda CR-V. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 831 kg more than 2009 Honda CR-V. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Lincoln Continental. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Honda CR-V | 1963 Lincoln Continental | |
Make | Honda | Lincoln |
Model | CR-V | Continental |
Year Released | 2009 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 7048 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 284 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1569 kg | 2400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 5500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 2000 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 3210 mm |