2009 Honda CR-V vs. 1965 Maserati Tipo 65
To start off, 2009 Honda CR-V is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Maserati Tipo 65. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Maserati Tipo 65 would be higher. At 5,046 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Maserati Tipo 65 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Maserati Tipo 65 (424 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 260 more horse power than 2009 Honda CR-V. (164 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Maserati Tipo 65 should accelerate faster than 2009 Honda CR-V.
Because 1965 Maserati Tipo 65 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Maserati Tipo 65. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Honda CR-V, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Honda CR-V has automatic transmission and 1965 Maserati Tipo 65 has manual transmission. 1965 Maserati Tipo 65 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Honda CR-V will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Honda CR-V | 1965 Maserati Tipo 65 | |
Make | Honda | Maserati |
Model | CR-V | Tipo 65 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1965 |
Engine Size | 2354 cc | 5046 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 164 HP | 424 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2410 mm |