2009 Honda CR-V vs. 1965 Volkswagen 1500
To start off, 2009 Honda CR-V is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Volkswagen 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Volkswagen 1500 would be higher. At 2,353 cc, 2009 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Honda CR-V (164 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 1965 Volkswagen 1500. (52 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 1965 Volkswagen 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Honda CR-V weights approximately 531 kg more than 1965 Volkswagen 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Volkswagen 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Volkswagen 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Honda CR-V, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Honda CR-V | 1965 Volkswagen 1500 | |
Make | Honda | Volkswagen |
Model | CR-V | 1500 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1965 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2353 cc | 1493 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 164 HP | 52 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1461 kg | 930 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4200 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.5 L/100km | 6.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 40 L |