2009 Honda CR-V vs. 1981 Seat 127
To start off, 2009 Honda CR-V is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Seat 127. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Seat 127 would be higher. At 2,354 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Honda CR-V (166 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 119 more horse power than 1981 Seat 127. (47 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 1981 Seat 127. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Honda CR-V weights approximately 756 kg more than 1981 Seat 127. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Honda CR-V (218 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 155 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Seat 127. (63 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2009 Honda CR-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Seat 127.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Honda CR-V | 1981 Seat 127 | |
Make | Honda | Seat |
Model | CR-V | 127 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2354 cc | 901 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 166 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 218 Nm | 63 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1461 kg | 705 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 3600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2230 mm |