2009 Honda CR-V vs. 1983 Mercury Lynx
To start off, 2009 Honda CR-V is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Mercury Lynx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Mercury Lynx would be higher. At 2,353 cc, 2009 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Honda CR-V (164 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 1983 Mercury Lynx. (70 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 1983 Mercury Lynx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Honda CR-V weights approximately 507 kg more than 1983 Mercury Lynx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Honda CR-V (220 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 99 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Mercury Lynx. (121 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Honda CR-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Mercury Lynx.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Honda CR-V | 1983 Mercury Lynx | |
Make | Honda | Mercury |
Model | CR-V | Lynx |
Year Released | 2009 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2353 cc | 1598 cc |
Horse Power | 164 HP | 70 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 220 Nm | 121 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 99 mm | 79.5 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1461 kg | 954 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2400 mm |