2009 Honda CR-V vs. 1992 Jaguar XJR
To start off, 2009 Honda CR-V is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 5,992 cc (12 cylinders), 1992 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Jaguar XJR (333 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 167 more horse power than 2009 Honda CR-V. (166 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Jaguar XJR should accelerate faster than 2009 Honda CR-V. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Honda CR-V weights approximately 219 kg more than 1992 Jaguar XJR.
Because 2009 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Jaguar XJR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Jaguar XJR (495 Nm @ 3650 RPM) has 277 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Honda CR-V. (218 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 1992 Jaguar XJR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Honda CR-V.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Honda CR-V | 1992 Jaguar XJR | |
| Make | Honda | Jaguar |
| Model | CR-V | XJR |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1992 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2354 cc | 5992 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 166 HP | 333 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 218 Nm | 495 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 3650 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 16.3:1 | 11.0:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2043 kg | 1824 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1890 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1270 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2600 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 9.1 L/100km | 14 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 11.8 L/100km | 21.3 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.7 L/100km | 13.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 89 L |
