2009 Honda CR-V vs. 1992 Mercury Villager
To start off, 2009 Honda CR-V is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mercury Villager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mercury Villager would be higher. At 2,960 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Mercury Villager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Honda CR-V (164 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1992 Mercury Villager. (149 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 1992 Mercury Villager. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Mercury Villager weights approximately 339 kg more than 2009 Honda CR-V.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Honda CR-V | 1992 Mercury Villager | |
Make | Honda | Mercury |
Model | CR-V | Villager |
Year Released | 2009 | 1992 |
Body Type | SUV | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2353 cc | 2960 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 164 HP | 149 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1461 kg | 1800 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2860 mm |