2009 Honda CR-V vs. 1996 Mitsubishi FTO

To start off, 2009 Honda CR-V is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi FTO would be higher. Both 2009 Honda CR-V and 1996 Mitsubishi FTO are equipped with a 1,998 cc engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO (195 HP) has 47 more horse power than 2009 Honda CR-V. (148 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO should accelerate faster than 2009 Honda CR-V.

Because 2009 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO (202 Nm) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Honda CR-V. (192 Nm). This means 1996 Mitsubishi FTO will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Honda CR-V. 1996 Mitsubishi FTO has automatic transmission and 2009 Honda CR-V has manual transmission. 2009 Honda CR-V will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Mitsubishi FTO will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: