2009 Honda CR-V vs. 2004 Volvo C70
To start off, 2009 Honda CR-V is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Volvo C70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Volvo C70 would be higher. At 2,401 cc (5 cylinders), 2004 Volvo C70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Volvo C70 (190 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 2009 Honda CR-V. (164 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Volvo C70 should accelerate faster than 2009 Honda CR-V. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Volvo C70 weights approximately 104 kg more than 2009 Honda CR-V. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Volvo C70 (285 Nm) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Honda CR-V. (220 Nm). This means 2004 Volvo C70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Honda CR-V.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Honda CR-V | 2004 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Honda | Volvo |
Model | CR-V | C70 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2353 cc | 2401 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 164 HP | 190 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 220 Nm | 285 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1461 kg | 1565 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 68 L |