2009 Honda CR-V vs. 2005 Jeep Cherokee

To start off, 2009 Honda CR-V is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Jeep Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Jeep Cherokee would be higher. At 3,700 cc, 2005 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Honda CR-V (166 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 2005 Jeep Cherokee. (150 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 2005 Jeep Cherokee. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Honda CR-V weights approximately 123 kg more than 2005 Jeep Cherokee. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jeep Cherokee (312 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 94 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Honda CR-V. (218 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 2005 Jeep Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Honda CR-V.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Honda CR-V 2005 Jeep Cherokee
Make Honda Jeep
Model CR-V Cherokee
Year Released 2009 2005
Body Type SUV SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2354 cc 3700 cc
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 166 HP 150 HP
Engine RPM 5800 RPM 3800 RPM
Torque 218 Nm 312 Nm
Torque RPM 4200 RPM 3800 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 10.5:1 9.1:1
Drive Type 4WD 4WD
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1990 kg 1867 kg
Wheelbase Size 2630 mm 2660 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 58 L 70 L