2009 Honda CR-V vs. 2005 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2009 Honda CR-V is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 2,354 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota Celica (180 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 2009 Honda CR-V. (166 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 2009 Honda CR-V. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Honda CR-V weights approximately 318 kg more than 2005 Toyota Celica.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Honda CR-V (218 Nm) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Toyota Celica. (176 Nm). This means 2009 Honda CR-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Honda CR-V | 2005 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Honda | Toyota |
Model | CR-V | Celica |
Year Released | 2009 | 2005 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2354 cc | 1803 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 166 HP | 180 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 218 Nm | 176 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 96.9 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 11.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1452 kg | 1134 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2910 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.9 L/100km | 7.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.9 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.4 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 55 L |