2009 Honda CR-V vs. 2006 Nissan Interstar
To start off, 2009 Honda CR-V is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Nissan Interstar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Nissan Interstar would be higher. In terms of performance, 2009 Honda CR-V (164 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 2006 Nissan Interstar. (112 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 2006 Nissan Interstar.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Nissan Interstar (290 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Honda CR-V. (220 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2006 Nissan Interstar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Honda CR-V. 2009 Honda CR-V has automatic transmission and 2006 Nissan Interstar has manual transmission. 2006 Nissan Interstar will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Honda CR-V will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Honda CR-V | 2006 Nissan Interstar | |
Make | Honda | Nissan |
Model | CR-V | Interstar |
Year Released | 2009 | 2006 |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 164 HP | 112 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Torque | 220 Nm | 290 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 1600 RPM |
Top Speed | 190 km/hour | 139 km/hour |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 580 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.7 L/100km | 8.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 100 L |