2009 Honda CR-V vs. 2008 Mazda Rustler
To start off, 2009 Honda CR-V is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Mazda Rustler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Mazda Rustler would be higher. At 2,352 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Honda CR-V weights approximately 447 kg more than 2008 Mazda Rustler.
Because 2009 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Mazda Rustler. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Honda CR-V (218 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 98 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda Rustler. (120 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2009 Honda CR-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda Rustler. 2009 Honda CR-V has automatic transmission and 2008 Mazda Rustler has manual transmission. 2008 Mazda Rustler will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Honda CR-V will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Honda CR-V | 2008 Mazda Rustler | |
Make | Honda | Mazda |
Model | CR-V | Rustler |
Year Released | 2009 | 2008 |
Engine Size | 2352 cc | 1586 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 166 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 218 Nm | 120 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 16.3:1 | 9.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1461 kg | 1014 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2570 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.7 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 54 L |