2009 Honda CR-V vs. 2011 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2011 Nissan Micra is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Honda CR-V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Honda CR-V would be higher. At 2,353 cc, 2009 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Honda CR-V (164 HP) has 85 more horse power than 2011 Nissan Micra. (79 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 2011 Nissan Micra.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Honda CR-V (220 Nm) has 112 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Nissan Micra. (108 Nm). This means 2009 Honda CR-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Nissan Micra.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Honda CR-V | 2011 Nissan Micra | |
| Make | Honda | Nissan |
| Model | CR-V | Micra |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2011 |
| Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2353 cc | 1200 cc |
| Horse Power | 164 HP | 79 HP |
| Torque | 220 Nm | 108 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1666 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1514 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2449 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.5 L/100km | 5.6 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 46 L |
