2009 Honda Fit vs. 1948 Studebaker Commander

To start off, 2009 Honda Fit is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Studebaker Commander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Studebaker Commander would be higher. At 3,703 cc (6 cylinders), 1948 Studebaker Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Honda Fit (117 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1948 Studebaker Commander. (94 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Honda Fit should accelerate faster than 1948 Studebaker Commander. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Honda Fit weights approximately 3 kg more than 1948 Studebaker Commander. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1948 Studebaker Commander is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1948 Studebaker Commander. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Honda Fit, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Honda Fit 1948 Studebaker Commander
Make Honda Studebaker
Model Fit Commander
Year Released 2009 1948
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1495 cc 3703 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 117 HP 94 HP
Engine RPM 6600 RPM 3600 RPM
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1461 kg 1458 kg
Vehicle Length 4110 mm 5200 mm
Vehicle Width 1700 mm 1780 mm
Wheelbase Size 2510 mm 3030 mm