2009 Honda Fit vs. 1952 Peugeot 203
To start off, 2009 Honda Fit is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Peugeot 203. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Peugeot 203 would be higher. At 1,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Honda Fit is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Honda Fit weights approximately 149 kg more than 1952 Peugeot 203.
Because 1952 Peugeot 203 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Peugeot 203. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Honda Fit, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Honda Fit | 1952 Peugeot 203 | |
Make | Honda | Peugeot |
Model | Fit | 203 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1952 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1499 cc | 1289 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 116 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1129 kg | 980 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4110 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2590 mm |