2009 Honda Fit vs. 1956 Isuzu Minx
To start off, 2009 Honda Fit is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 1,495 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Honda Fit is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Honda Fit (117 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 1956 Isuzu Minx. (37 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Honda Fit should accelerate faster than 1956 Isuzu Minx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Honda Fit weights approximately 495 kg more than 1956 Isuzu Minx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1956 Isuzu Minx is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Isuzu Minx. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Honda Fit, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Honda Fit | 1956 Isuzu Minx | |
Make | Honda | Isuzu |
Model | Fit | Minx |
Year Released | 2009 | 1956 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1495 cc | 1265 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 117 HP | 37 HP |
Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1461 kg | 966 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4110 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2370 mm |