2009 Honda Fit vs. 1965 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 2009 Honda Fit is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 1,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Honda Fit is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Honda Fit (116 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1965 Riley Kestrel. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Honda Fit should accelerate faster than 1965 Riley Kestrel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Honda Fit weights approximately 244 kg more than 1965 Riley Kestrel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Honda Fit (106 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Riley Kestrel. (84 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2009 Honda Fit will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Riley Kestrel.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Honda Fit | 1965 Riley Kestrel | |
Make | Honda | Riley |
Model | Fit | Kestrel |
Year Released | 2009 | 1965 |
Engine Size | 1499 cc | 1098 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 116 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 106 Nm | 84 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1129 kg | 885 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4110 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2380 mm |