2009 Honda Fit vs. 2004 Isuzu Rodeo
To start off, 2009 Honda Fit is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Isuzu Rodeo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Isuzu Rodeo would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Isuzu Rodeo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Isuzu Rodeo (250 HP) has 133 more horse power than 2009 Honda Fit. (117 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Isuzu Rodeo should accelerate faster than 2009 Honda Fit. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Isuzu Rodeo weights approximately 329 kg more than 2009 Honda Fit. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Isuzu Rodeo (334 Nm) has 190 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Honda Fit. (144 Nm). This means 2004 Isuzu Rodeo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Honda Fit.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Honda Fit | 2004 Isuzu Rodeo | |
| Make | Honda | Isuzu |
| Model | Fit | Rodeo |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1495 cc | 3491 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 117 HP | 250 HP |
| Torque | 144 Nm | 334 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 16.3:1 | 10.3:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1461 kg | 1790 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4110 mm | 4520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2710 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 7.1 L/100km | 10.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 8.7 L/100km | 13.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.1 L/100km | 11.9 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 74 L |
