2009 Honda Fit vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2013 Mini Countryman is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Honda Fit. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Honda Fit would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Honda Fit weights approximately 121 kg more than 2013 Mini Countryman.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mini Countryman (155 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Honda Fit. (144 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 2013 Mini Countryman will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Honda Fit.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Honda Fit | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
| Make | Honda | Mini |
| Model | Fit | Countryman |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Crossover |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 117 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 144 Nm | 155 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1461 kg | 1340 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4110 mm | 4097 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1993 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1561 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2595 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 7.1 L/100km | 5.5 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 8.7 L/100km | 7.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 47 L |
