2009 Honda Jazz vs. 1951 Jeep CJ3A
To start off, 2009 Honda Jazz is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Jeep CJ3A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Jeep CJ3A would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1951 Jeep CJ3A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Honda Jazz (77 HP) has 18 more horse power than 1951 Jeep CJ3A. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Honda Jazz should accelerate faster than 1951 Jeep CJ3A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Jeep CJ3A weights approximately 62 kg more than 2009 Honda Jazz.
Because 1951 Jeep CJ3A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Honda Jazz. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1951 Jeep CJ3A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1951 Jeep CJ3A (145 Nm) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Honda Jazz. (110 Nm). This means 1951 Jeep CJ3A will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Honda Jazz.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Honda Jazz | 1951 Jeep CJ3A | |
| Make | Honda | Jeep |
| Model | Jazz | CJ3A |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1951 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1245 cc | 2199 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 77 HP | 59 HP |
| Torque | 110 Nm | 145 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1048 kg | 1110 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3840 mm | 3130 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1460 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2040 mm |
