2009 Honda Jazz vs. 1986 Mazda RX-7
To start off, 2009 Honda Jazz is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Mazda RX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Mazda RX-7 would be higher. At 2,354 cc, 1986 Mazda RX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Mazda RX-7 (185 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 2009 Honda Jazz. (99 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Mazda RX-7 should accelerate faster than 2009 Honda Jazz.
Because 1986 Mazda RX-7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Mazda RX-7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Honda Jazz, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Mazda RX-7 (246 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 119 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Honda Jazz. (127 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 1986 Mazda RX-7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Honda Jazz.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Honda Jazz | 1986 Mazda RX-7 | |
Make | Honda | Mazda |
Model | Jazz | RX-7 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1986 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1339 cc | 2354 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 99 HP | 185 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 127 Nm | 246 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Top Speed | 176 km/hour | 230 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3910 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2430 mm |