2009 Honda Jazz vs. 2006 Rover 25
To start off, 2009 Honda Jazz is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Rover 25. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Rover 25 would be higher. At 1,588 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Rover 25 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Honda Jazz (118 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2006 Rover 25. (108 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Honda Jazz should accelerate faster than 2006 Rover 25.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Honda Jazz (145 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Rover 25. (138 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2009 Honda Jazz will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Rover 25.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Honda Jazz | 2006 Rover 25 | |
Make | Honda | Rover |
Model | Jazz | 25 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1497 cc | 1588 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 138 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 9.5 seconds | 9.5 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3910 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.4 L/100km | 6.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 50 L |