2009 Honda Pilot vs. 1966 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2009 Honda Pilot is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 3,471 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Honda Pilot is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Honda Pilot (250 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 159 more horse power than 1966 Triumph 2000. (91 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Honda Pilot should accelerate faster than 1966 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Honda Pilot weights approximately 785 kg more than 1966 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Honda Pilot (343 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 185 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Honda Pilot will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Honda Pilot | 1966 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Honda | Triumph |
Model | Pilot | 2000 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3471 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 91 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 343 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 16.3:1 | 9.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1955 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 64 L |