2009 Honda Ridgeline vs. 2004 Toyota Sequoia
To start off, 2009 Honda Ridgeline is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Toyota Sequoia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Toyota Sequoia would be higher. At 4,671 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Toyota Sequoia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Honda Ridgeline (250 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2004 Toyota Sequoia. (240 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Honda Ridgeline should accelerate faster than 2004 Toyota Sequoia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota Sequoia weights approximately 1107 kg more than 2009 Honda Ridgeline.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota Sequoia (427 Nm) has 92 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Honda Ridgeline. (335 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota Sequoia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Honda Ridgeline.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Honda Ridgeline | 2004 Toyota Sequoia | |
Make | Honda | Toyota |
Model | Ridgeline | Sequoia |
Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3471 cc | 4671 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 240 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 335 Nm | 427 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 16.3:1 | 9.6:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1193 kg | 2300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5260 mm | 5210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 3010 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 11.9 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.8 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 83 L | 99 L |