2009 Hummer H2 vs. 1960 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud
To start off, 2009 Hummer H2 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud would be higher. At 6,230 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Hummer H2 weights approximately 738 kg more than 1960 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud.
Because 2009 Hummer H2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Hummer H2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Hummer H2 | 1960 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud | |
| Make | Hummer | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | H2 | Silver Cloud |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1960 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6162 cc | 6230 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 388 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2850 kg | 2112 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 5490 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2070 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2020 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 3070 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 15.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 121 L | 81 L |
