2009 Hummer H2 vs. 1996 Mitsubishi FTO
To start off, 2009 Hummer H2 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi FTO would be higher. At 6,199 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Hummer H2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Hummer H2 (393 HP) has 198 more horse power than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. (195 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Hummer H2 should accelerate faster than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO.
Because 2009 Hummer H2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Hummer H2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Hummer H2 (564 Nm) has 362 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. (202 Nm). This means 2009 Hummer H2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Hummer H2 | 1996 Mitsubishi FTO | |
| Make | Hummer | Mitsubishi |
| Model | H2 | FTO |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1996 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6199 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 393 HP | 195 HP |
| Torque | 564 Nm | 202 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4320 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2070 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2020 mm | 1300 mm |
