2009 Hummer H2 vs. 2008 Mazda 6
To start off, 2009 Hummer H2 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Mazda 6 would be higher. At 6,199 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Hummer H2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Hummer H2 (393 HP) has 289 more horse power than 2008 Mazda 6. (104 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Hummer H2 should accelerate faster than 2008 Mazda 6.
Because 2009 Hummer H2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Mazda 6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Hummer H2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Hummer H2 (563 Nm) has 418 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda 6. (145 Nm). This means 2009 Hummer H2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Hummer H2 | 2008 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Hummer | Mazda |
Model | H2 | 6 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2008 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6199 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 393 HP | 104 HP |
Torque | 563 Nm | 145 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2020 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.7 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 121 L | 55 L |