2009 Hummer H2 vs. 2012 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2012 Holden Commodore is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Hummer H2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Hummer H2 would be higher. At 6,199 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Hummer H2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Hummer H2 (393 HP) has 153 more horse power than 2012 Holden Commodore. (240 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Hummer H2 should accelerate faster than 2012 Holden Commodore.
Because 2009 Hummer H2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Holden Commodore. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Hummer H2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Hummer H2 (564 Nm) has 324 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden Commodore. (240 Nm). This means 2009 Hummer H2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden Commodore. 2009 Hummer H2 has automatic transmission and 2012 Holden Commodore has manual transmission. 2012 Holden Commodore will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Hummer H2 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Hummer H2 | 2012 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Hummer | Holden |
Model | H2 | Commodore |
Year Released | 2009 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6199 cc | 2564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 393 HP | 240 HP |
Torque | 564 Nm | 240 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.7 L/100km | 10.9 L/100km |