2009 Hummer H3 vs. 1973 Mazda RX-2

To start off, 2009 Hummer H3 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 3,653 cc (5 cylinders), 2009 Hummer H3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Hummer H3 (243 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 125 more horse power than 1973 Mazda RX-2. (118 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Hummer H3 should accelerate faster than 1973 Mazda RX-2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Hummer H3 weights approximately 1271 kg more than 1973 Mazda RX-2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2009 Hummer H3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1973 Mazda RX-2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Hummer H3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Hummer H3 (328 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 171 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Mazda RX-2. (157 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2009 Hummer H3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Mazda RX-2.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Hummer H3 1973 Mazda RX-2
Make Hummer Mazda
Model H3 RX-2
Year Released 2009 1973
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3653 cc 2292 cc
Engine Type in-line dual-disk rotary
Horse Power 243 HP 118 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 6500 RPM
Torque 328 Nm 157 Nm
Torque RPM 4600 RPM 3500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type 4WD Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 2231 kg 960 kg
Vehicle Length 4790 mm 4160 mm
Vehicle Width 1900 mm 1590 mm
Vehicle Height 2000 mm 1400 mm
Wheelbase Size 2850 mm 2480 mm