2009 Hummer H3 vs. 2003 Mazda 6
To start off, 2009 Hummer H3 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mazda 6 would be higher. At 3,653 cc (5 cylinders), 2009 Hummer H3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Hummer H3 (242 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 2003 Mazda 6. (164 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Hummer H3 should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Hummer H3 weights approximately 764 kg more than 2003 Mazda 6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Hummer H3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Mazda 6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Hummer H3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Hummer H3 (328 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 120 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mazda 6. (208 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Hummer H3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Hummer H3 | 2003 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Hummer | Mazda |
Model | H3 | 6 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2003 |
Body Type | SUV | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3653 cc | 2261 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 242 HP | 164 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 328 Nm | 208 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline - Premium |
Top Speed | 155 km/hour | 211 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 9.7 seconds | 9 seconds |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2194 kg | 1430 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2000 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.9 L/100km | 8.9 L/100km |