2009 Hummer H3 vs. 2008 Renault Clio
To start off, 2009 Hummer H3 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Renault Clio would be higher. At 3,653 cc (5 cylinders), 2009 Hummer H3 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Hummer H3 weights approximately 859 kg more than 2008 Renault Clio.
Because 2009 Hummer H3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Hummer H3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Hummer H3 (327 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Renault Clio. (301 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2009 Hummer H3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Hummer H3 | 2008 Renault Clio | |
Make | Hummer | Renault |
Model | H3 | Clio |
Year Released | 2009 | 2008 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 3653 cc | 2946 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 239 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 327 Nm | 301 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2194 kg | 1335 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5410 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3420 mm | 2520 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 11.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 102 L | 61 L |