2009 Hyundai Atos vs. 1992 Jaguar XJR
To start off, 2009 Hyundai Atos is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 5,992 cc (12 cylinders), 1992 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Jaguar XJR (333 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 273 more horse power than 2009 Hyundai Atos. (60 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Jaguar XJR should accelerate faster than 2009 Hyundai Atos. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Jaguar XJR weights approximately 1026 kg more than 2009 Hyundai Atos. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1992 Jaguar XJR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 Jaguar XJR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Hyundai Atos, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Jaguar XJR (495 Nm @ 3650 RPM) has 408 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Hyundai Atos. (87 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1992 Jaguar XJR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Hyundai Atos. 1992 Jaguar XJR has automatic transmission and 2009 Hyundai Atos has manual transmission. 2009 Hyundai Atos will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1992 Jaguar XJR will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Hyundai Atos | 1992 Jaguar XJR | |
Make | Hyundai | Jaguar |
Model | Atos | XJR |
Year Released | 2009 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1086 cc | 5992 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 333 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 87 Nm | 495 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3650 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 67 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 77 mm | 78.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 11.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 798 kg | 1824 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3570 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2600 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.2 L/100km | 13.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 89 L |