2009 Hyundai Elantra vs. 2010 Toyota Aygo
To start off, 2010 Toyota Aygo is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Hyundai Elantra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Hyundai Elantra would be higher. At 1,975 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Hyundai Elantra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Hyundai Elantra (138 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 2010 Toyota Aygo. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Hyundai Elantra should accelerate faster than 2010 Toyota Aygo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Hyundai Elantra weights approximately 454 kg more than 2010 Toyota Aygo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Hyundai Elantra (184 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 91 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Toyota Aygo. (93 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2009 Hyundai Elantra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Toyota Aygo. 2009 Hyundai Elantra has automatic transmission and 2010 Toyota Aygo has manual transmission. 2010 Toyota Aygo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Hyundai Elantra will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Hyundai Elantra | 2010 Toyota Aygo | |
Make | Hyundai | Toyota |
Model | Elantra | Aygo |
Year Released | 2009 | 2010 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1975 cc | 998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 184 Nm | 93 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.9 mm | 71 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 93.5 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.1:1 | 10.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1318 kg | 864 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 3405 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1615 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2340 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 7.6 L/100km | 4.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 10.2 L/100km | 5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.1 L/100km | 4.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 35 L |