2009 Hyundai Matrix vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2009 Hyundai Matrix is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,498 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Triumph 2000 (130 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 2009 Hyundai Matrix. (102 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 2009 Hyundai Matrix. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Hyundai Matrix weights approximately 128 kg more than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Let's talk about torque, 1963 Triumph 2000 (198 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Hyundai Matrix. (141 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1963 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Hyundai Matrix.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Hyundai Matrix | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Hyundai | Triumph |
| Model | Matrix | 2000 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1599 cc | 2498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 102 HP | 130 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 141 Nm | 198 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1323 kg | 1195 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2700 mm |
