2009 Jaguar S-Type vs. 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2009 Jaguar S-Type is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 2,718 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Jaguar S-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jaguar S-Type weights approximately 294 kg more than 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 2009 Jaguar S-Type is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Jaguar S-Type. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Jaguar S-Type | 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Jaguar | Oldsmobile |
Model | S-Type | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2009 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2718 cc | 2260 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 205 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 1326 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2680 mm |