2009 Jaguar XF vs. 1960 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2009 Jaguar XF is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jaguar XF (410 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 350 more horse power than 1960 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1960 Nissan Cedric.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jaguar XF (560 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 444 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Nissan Cedric. (116 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2009 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Jaguar XF | 1960 Nissan Cedric | |
| Make | Jaguar | Nissan |
| Model | XF | Cedric |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4196 cc | 1488 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 410 HP | 60 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 560 Nm | 116 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Length | 4970 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2540 mm |
