2009 Jaguar XF vs. 1962 Simca 1000
To start off, 2009 Jaguar XF is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Simca 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Simca 1000 would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jaguar XF (300 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 249 more horse power than 1962 Simca 1000. (51 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1962 Simca 1000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jaguar XF (420 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 347 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Simca 1000. (73 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2009 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Simca 1000.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Jaguar XF | 1962 Simca 1000 | |
Make | Jaguar | Simca |
Model | XF | 1000 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1962 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 4196 cc | 944 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 51 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 420 Nm | 73 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4100 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 8.2:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4970 mm | 3930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1260 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2230 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 36 L |