2009 Jaguar XF vs. 1964 Volkswagen 1500
To start off, 2009 Jaguar XF is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Volkswagen 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Volkswagen 1500 would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jaguar XF (410 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 358 more horse power than 1964 Volkswagen 1500. (52 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1964 Volkswagen 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jaguar XF weights approximately 918 kg more than 1964 Volkswagen 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Jaguar XF | 1964 Volkswagen 1500 | |
Make | Jaguar | Volkswagen |
Model | XF | 1500 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1964 |
Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 4196 cc | 1493 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 410 HP | 52 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1848 kg | 930 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4970 mm | 4200 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2430 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 69 L | 40 L |