2009 Jaguar XF vs. 1965 Morgan 4
To start off, 2009 Jaguar XF is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Morgan 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Morgan 4 would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jaguar XF (410 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 355 more horse power than 1965 Morgan 4. (55 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1965 Morgan 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jaguar XF weights approximately 1182 kg more than 1965 Morgan 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Jaguar XF | 1965 Morgan 4 | |
| Make | Jaguar | Morgan |
| Model | XF | 4 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4196 cc | 1340 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 410 HP | 55 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1842 kg | 660 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4970 mm | 3670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1430 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1300 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2450 mm |
