2009 Jaguar XF vs. 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire
To start off, 2009 Jaguar XF is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire would be higher. At 6,965 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire weights approximately 141 kg more than 2009 Jaguar XF.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Jaguar XF | 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire | |
Make | Jaguar | Oldsmobile |
Model | XF | Starfire |
Year Released | 2009 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2967 cc | 6965 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 235 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1679 kg | 1820 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4970 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 3130 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 60 L |