2009 Jaguar XF vs. 1965 Renault 8
To start off, 2009 Jaguar XF is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Renault 8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Renault 8 would be higher. At 2,720 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jaguar XF (204 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 157 more horse power than 1965 Renault 8. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1965 Renault 8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jaguar XF weights approximately 765 kg more than 1965 Renault 8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Jaguar XF | 1965 Renault 8 | |
| Make | Jaguar | Renault |
| Model | XF | 8 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2720 cc | 955 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 204 HP | 47 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1505 kg | 740 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4970 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1500 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2280 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 38 L |
