2009 Jaguar XF vs. 1967 Jaguar 240
To start off, 2009 Jaguar XF is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Jaguar 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Jaguar 240 would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jaguar XF (410 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 202 more horse power than 1967 Jaguar 240. (208 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1967 Jaguar 240. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jaguar XF weights approximately 328 kg more than 1967 Jaguar 240. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jaguar XF (560 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 260 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Jaguar 240. (300 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Jaguar 240.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Jaguar XF | 1967 Jaguar 240 | |
Make | Jaguar | Jaguar |
Model | XF | 240 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4196 cc | 3442 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 410 HP | 208 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 560 Nm | 300 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.1:1 | 8.1:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1848 kg | 1520 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4970 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2740 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 69 L | 54 L |