2009 Jaguar XF vs. 1970 Jaguar Type E
To start off, 2009 Jaguar XF is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Jaguar Type E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Jaguar Type E would be higher. At 4,235 cc (6 cylinders), 1970 Jaguar Type E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Jaguar Type E (225 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 2009 Jaguar XF. (204 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1970 Jaguar Type E should accelerate faster than 2009 Jaguar XF. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jaguar XF weights approximately 105 kg more than 1970 Jaguar Type E.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Jaguar XF | 1970 Jaguar Type E | |
Make | Jaguar | Jaguar |
Model | XF | Type E |
Year Released | 2009 | 1970 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2720 cc | 4235 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 204 HP | 225 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1505 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4970 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1190 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2450 mm |